Hari Hara Veera Mallu Part 1 - Movie Review
Hari Hara Veera Mallu, the long-delayed historical fiction starring Pawan Kalyan, was initially helmed by director Krish Jagarlamudi. However, creative differences led to Krish’s exit and A. M. Jyothi Krishna taking over direction with a revised script. Set in 17th-century Mughal India, the film’s ambition is undeniable, but the final product falls short due to erratic storytelling and technical inconsistencies.
Plot Summary
Veera Mallu (Pawan Kalyan), a Robin Hood-like outlaw, steals from foreign invaders to help the oppressed. After being captured, he’s assigned a mission by the Golconda king to infiltrate the Mughal Empire and retrieve the famed Kohinoor diamond from Emperor Aurangzeb (Bobby Deol). As Veera embarks on this high-stakes heist, the story unravels his past, his bond with devadasi Panchami (Nidhhi Agerwal), and his spiritual mentor Veda Pandit (Sathyaraj).
Performances
Pawan Kalyan impresses in several action set pieces and the film’s first half, but the inconsistency in his look and energy—likely due to the staggered shooting schedule—is jarring. His screen presence remains magnetic, yet noticeably diminished in the second half. Bobby Deol brings gravitas to Aurangzeb in a limited role. Nidhhi Agerwal gets decent screen time and performs sincerely. Kota Srinivasa Rao’s brief appearance is a nostalgic delight, while the remaining ensemble, despite their experience, remain underutilized due to underwritten roles.
Technical Merits and Demerits
-
Music: MM Keeravani’s background score elevates otherwise flat scenes and is one of the few saving graces. Dialogues by Sai Madhav Burra are sharp and impactful, with several lines adding weight to Veera Mallu’s persona.
-
Cinematography: The first half’s visuals are decent, but the second half suffers heavily due to over-reliance on green screens and subpar VFX.
-
Editing: Praveen K. L.’s editing fails to maintain rhythm, especially in the bloated second half.
-
Production Design & VFX: Despite the film’s scale, the production feels outdated, and the poor visual effects significantly reduce its cinematic value.
Analysis
The first half, presumably directed by Krish, shows promise with sequences like the Charminar fight and Veera’s introduction. However, the second half—led by Jyothi Krishna—plummets in quality. Sequences intended to be emotional or visually grand (e.g., “Deeksha for rain”) fall flat due to weak CGI and lack of conviction. The film becomes more style than substance, losing narrative momentum and emotional depth.
Inconsistencies in Pawan Kalyan’s appearance and performance further highlight the production issues. Scenes swing between compelling and careless, which hampers audience immersion. The climax drags unnecessarily, diluting the impact of what could have been a symbolic finish.
Pros
-
Engaging first half
-
A few well-executed action sequences
-
Keeravani’s effective background score
-
Memorable pre-interval twist
Cons
-
Disjointed second half
-
Substandard VFX and visual inconsistencies
-
Lack of emotional engagement
-
Outdated direction and execution
Conclusion
Hari Hara Veera Mallu had the potential to be a landmark period action film in Telugu cinema. Unfortunately, it ends up as a disjointed experience, hampered by production delays, creative turnover, and technical missteps. While it might attract initial footfall due to Pawan Kalyan’s fanbase, sustaining momentum at the box office appears unlikely.
Final Verdict: A promising idea weighed down by poor execution and inconsistent direction. A missed opportunity for everyone involved.
