The high-stakes summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, held at the largest US military facility in Alaska on August 15, concluded on a cautiously positive note, despite no immediate announcement of a ceasefire.

During a joint press conference, both leaders underscored the productivity of their discussions, though no questions were taken. Putin described the meeting as “a starting point” for resolving the Russia-Ukraine conflict, acknowledging Trump’s “sincerity of purpose” and emphasizing that their interaction contributed to a “business-like and pragmatic” US-Russia relationship.

President Trump highlighted that “both sides made great progress,” noting several points of agreement while adding his trademark comment, “there is no deal unless there is a deal.” The summit reportedly fostered a personal rapport between the two leaders, reflected in Putin’s remark that had Trump been president earlier, the Russia-Ukraine war might have been avoided.

Trump indicated that he would soon meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and NATO allies to advance the agenda set in Alaska. Both leaders envisaged a follow-up summit, with Putin suggesting Moscow and Trump responding humorously that he might “get a little heat” for that. Both expressed concern over perceived anti-Russian policies by the Biden Administration, particularly regarding the 2020 US Presidential election.

Significantly, Putin agreed that Ukraine should receive security guarantees, with the details to be worked out. He expressed hope that European allies would not “throw a wrench in the works,” a reference to Zelensky’s insistence on NATO membership for Ukraine—a demand firmly opposed by Russia. Trump confirmed that while progress had been made on many points, some key issues remained unresolved.

The subsequent White House meeting on August 18, attended by Zelensky, key European leaders—including UK Prime Minister, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister, German Chancellor Frederik Merz—and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, advanced these discussions further. Trump emphasized US support for European efforts to “police” any peace deal in Ukraine, while ruling out NATO membership for Kyiv. Zelensky expressed gratitude for US backing of security guarantees, with Trump noting that Putin appeared open to such assurances. NATO Secretary General Rutte described the development as an optimistic step toward ending the conflict.

French President Macron stressed that security guarantees for Ukraine were also meant to safeguard Europe’s collective security. European participants voiced cautious optimism but highlighted unresolved issues, including territorial adjustments and civilian exchanges. They insisted on a ceasefire before substantive talks could begin. Trump, however, aligned more closely with Putin, emphasizing a focus on lasting peace rather than temporary ceasefires.

Trump’s proactive diplomacy, including a call to Putin during the August 18 meeting to secure agreement on security guarantees, marks a significant US initiative toward resolving a conflict that has lasted over three years and was widely perceived as having the potential to escalate into a broader war. While a full ceasefire remains pending, incremental measures—such as reconstruction commitments, territorial readjustments, prisoner exchanges, and the deployment of a peacekeeping force—could lay the groundwork for a lasting resolution. A degree of federal autonomy for Ukrainian regions and the preservation of democratic governance may also help address Russian concerns.

Minor skirmishes by both sides in late August signal the sensitivity of the negotiations, reflecting a desire to avoid appearing weak. The progress achieved thus far largely stems from Trump’s position that the US does not support Ukraine’s NATO membership and a corresponding easing of anti-Russian rhetoric in Europe.

The next steps will likely involve bilateral or trilateral meetings between Putin and Zelensky, facilitated by Trump, aimed at creating a level playing field that ensures neither side claims total victory. India, meanwhile, has sought to ensure that its purchase of Russian oil does not impede these peace efforts, emphasizing its independent, non-aligned foreign policy approach.

The Alaska summit and subsequent White House discussions mark an important phase in diplomatic efforts to bring the Russia-Ukraine conflict closer to resolution, highlighting the delicate balancing act required to achieve security guarantees for Ukraine while addressing Russia’s strategic interests.