A wave of criticism has emerged in India over former U.S. President Donald Trump’s involvement in the Indo-Pakistan conflict, following a tweet that many interpreted as sarcastic and insensitive. Phrases such as “common sense” and “great intelligence” used in his statement were perceived as patronizing, leading to widespread frustration among Indian citizens.

Social media reactions were swift and pointed. One user bluntly wrote, “Who are you, Trump, to come in between? Keep your mouth shut!” — a sentiment echoed by many who felt Trump’s remarks were unwarranted and ill-timed.

Prominent Indian journalist Arnab Goswami also voiced his disapproval, criticizing Trump for seemingly taking undue credit for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Goswami emphasized that the ceasefire was initiated following Pakistan’s request, and that India had merely responded, not sought intervention.

Adding to the criticism, many users online questioned Trump’s shift in stance, pointing out that he had previously insisted on non-interference in the internal affairs of foreign nations. This perceived inconsistency further fueled the backlash.

Beyond Trump’s comments, public discourse also turned toward the ceasefire terms, with some netizens expressing concern that key strategic and diplomatic issues were being overlooked. Questions were raised about the Indus Water Treaty, the status of PoK (Pakistan-occupied Kashmir), and the case of Kulbhushan Jadhav.

One user remarked, “What about the Indus Water Treaty? What about PoK? What about Kulbhushan Yadav? All these issues should have been resolved before agreeing to a ceasefire.” Another disappointed post read, “India could have captured PoK before the ceasefire — I’m disappointed.”

Although views are divided, one thing is clear: the ceasefire announcement has caught many off guard, leaving a mix of skepticism, frustration, and concern about the long-term implications for India’s strategic interests.