Maoists life threatening letter to AP CM Chandrababu
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xr4Ij6Ja2RY

That’s how our producers count the market figures, rather than relying on the type of content they are coming up with. Here comes a tale of demand from leading producer Dil Raju who wants to make most out of his upcoming film “Maharshi”, featuring Mahesh Babu in the lead.
In the recent times, the moment you turn to any leading Hindi entertainment channel, you will end up watching dubbed Telugu movies. As the market for Telugu dubbed versions are very high now, our makers are also demanding huge sums. Perhaps, that’s why an upcoming film of Ram Charan that has Boyapati Seenu directing it, has fetched 22 crores from Hindi satellite sales.
Taking this into consideration, Dil Raju is now said to be demanding 25 crores from the Hindi circuits to shell out the rights of Maharshi. However, as Charan-Boyapati film is an out and out mass masala movie, Hindi channel paid such high price. Because for any film to be sold, 3-4 fights are a must.
And with talk everywhere that Mahesh will be seen as a software engineer in the USA with college backdrop flashback, it looks like the movie will be low on action elements. For that reason, Maharshi may not fetch a high price, which Dil Raju refuses to believe. We have to see if class-looking Mahesh from Maharshi will really bring home 25 crores.

Actress-entrepreneur Shilpa Shetty Kundra on Sunday alleged that she faced an unpleasant experience for being “brown” at the Sydney airport over her cabin luggage. Upset by an official who was curt, she says people’s tone must not change with preference to colour.
Shilpa, who dealt with racism in 2007 when she was a contestant on the fifth season of the British reality show “Celebrity Big Brother” — which she went on to win — faced the latest experience while boarding a plane for Melbourne from Sydney.
The 43-year-old took to Instagram to share the ordeal with a Qantas Airways lady staff member over a cabin luggage, which was deemed as ‘oversized’ at the check-in counter.
A furious Shilpa wrote: “At the check-in counter, met a grumpy Mel (that’s her name) who decided it was ‘okay’ to speak curtly to ‘us’ (brown people!) travelling together. I was flying business and had 2 bags (my allowance) and she insisted and decided my half empty duffel bag was oversized (to check-in), so she sent us to check it in at the other counter dealing with ‘oversized luggage’.
“There a polite lady (yes this one was) said, ‘This is not an oversized bag, please check this in manually if you can at another counter’ (all this happening while the counter is going to shut in five minutes).
“As the manual check-in wasn’t going through for five minutes (we tried), I went upto Mel and requested her to put the bag through as her colleague said it wasn’t an oversized bag. She refused again… Just being adamant especially when I told her this is causing a lot of inconvenience.
“We had no time to waste so we ran to the oversized baggage counter and requested her to put the bag through which she did after I told her that rude Mel had issues! To which another colleague joined in and reiterated my duffle wasn’t oversized and could’ve easily been checked in.”
The “Dhadkan” actress said her intention to narrate her experience is to make Qantas Airways take cognisance of the matter.
“Their staff must be taught to be helpful and tone can’t change with preference to colour. ‘We’ are not pushovers and they must know that being callous and rude will not be tolerated,” she added.
Along with the note, Shilpa also posted a picture of her bag and asked her followers “whether it is oversized or not”.

The Trump administration may deny green cards to immigrants who have availed or may avail government benefits including food and cash assistance under new rules which could negatively affect hundreds of thousands of Indians living in the US.
The proposed rule signed by the Homeland Security Secretary on September 21 and posted on the website of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was slammed by the Silicon Valley-based tech industry and political leaders.
According to the rule, foreign immigrants who “seek adjustment of status or a visa, or who are applicants for admission, must establish that they are not likely at any time to become a public charge” unless determined by Congress. Public charge means receiving government benefits.
The latest move to crack down on immigration comes days after the Trump administration told a federal court that its decision to revoke work permits to H-4 visa users, a significant majority of whom are Indian-Americans, is expected within the next three months, a move which will have a major impact on Indian women as they are the major beneficiary of the Obama-era rule.
The DHS proposes to require all immigrants seeking an extension of stay or change of status to demonstrate that they have not received, are not currently receiving, nor are likely to receive public benefits as defined in the proposed rule.
“Under long-standing federal law, those seeking to immigrate to the United States must show they can support themselves financially,” said Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.
“The department takes seriously its responsibility to be transparent in its rule-making and is welcoming public comment on the proposed rule.
“This proposed rule will implement a law passed by Congress intended to promote immigrant self-sufficiency and protect finite resources by ensuring that they are not likely to become burdens on American taxpayers,” she said.
Expressing its opposition to the proposed rule, FWD.US, which represents companies like Facebook, Microsoft, Dropbox, Yahoo and Google, said it “is a backdoor” administrative end-run to substantially reduce legal immigration that, if implemented, will hurt the entire country.
“This policy will cost the United States in the long run by limiting the contributions of hardworking immigrants who could become legal residents, and no one is better off because of it,” FWD.us president Todd Schulte said.
It would create a subjective criteria and overly-bureaucratic process when making a public charge determination. It is “another underhanded attempt to force cuts to legal immigration, ultimately hurting our communities and country,” Mr Schulte said.
The proposed public charge rule is nothing less than a public disgrace – and a direct attack on the health, housing, and economic security of American children, said Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti.
“Our federal government should not be in the business of penalising low-income parents, punishing kids, or targeting immigrants who work hard, strengthen our economy, pay taxes, and play by the rules,” Mr Garcetti said.
The legislation could have a major impact on Indians, mostly from the tech industry working in the US.
As of April, there were 632,219 Indian immigrants and their spouses and minor children waiting for green cards.
According to US Citizenship and Immigration Services, in all 306,400 primary Indian applicants are waiting for their green cards. Clubbed with their spouses and children numbering 325,819; as many as 632,219 Indians in all are waiting for their green cards.
People have 60 day-time to comment on the proposed rule, which will mainly impact legal immigrants as illegal immigrants are not eligible for any government benefits.
There is possibility of changes in the proposed rule before it is being promulgated.
The DHS said the proposed regulation defines a public charge to be a person who receives certain public benefits above certain defined threshold amounts or for longer than certain periods of time.
In making this determination, the DHS is proposing to consider current and past receipt of designated public benefits above certain thresholds as a heavily weighed negative factor.
The rule would also make non-immigrants who receive or are likely to receive designated public benefits above the designated threshold generally ineligible for change of status and extension of stay.
The public benefits proposed to be designated in this rule are federal, state, local, or tribal cash assistance for income maintenance, temporary assistance for needy families, supplemental security income, medicaid (with limited exceptions for Medicaid benefits paid for an “emergency medical condition,” and for certain disability services related to education), medicare part D low income subsidy, and the supplemental nutrition assistance programme.

Recently on the eve of legendary actor Akkineni Nageswara Rao’s birthday, NTR and ANR’s old smoking picture, where they are lighting up a cigarette has come to life yet again. This time it featured Balakrishna and Sumanth doing it.
Yes, both NTR and ANR used to be smokers and there was that incident where ANR is lighting the cigarette of NTR with a matchstick. Often this picture is considered as a witness to their warm friendship despite the fact that they are two big heroes at the competition at that time. Here comes an interesting snippet as to why this scene is shot for the film.
Actually, director Krish wants to tap the memory of audiences by showcasing those images that were already in the minds of Telugu people, this time as scenes. So by showing this particular shot, they will be now talking about what happened that day. Convinced by this idea, even Balakrishna is said to have given an instant nod for the smoking-hot shot.
And then, after the release of this poster, there is a comment that in real life NTR is taller than ANR, but here it is vice-versa as Sumanth is taller that of Balayya. Common, in reality, King Akbar is a bit more than 4-feet, but a 6-foot tall Hrithik played his role in Jodhaa Akbar, isn’t that convincing? Enjoy the film rather than plucking hairs from an egg.
In what can be a major embarrassment to Narendra Modi & his government, ex-French president François Hollande has stated that ‘Indian Govt proposed Reliance, we had no choice’. Hollande made these comments in his latest interview to a leading French newspaper. With such comments directly coming from the former French president, tempers arose in India between the government and Opposition.
Congress president Rahul Gandhi, who has been targeting Modi sarkar over Rafale deal with France, has now got a shot in the arm. Rahul and Opposition leaders have intensified the attack against BJP.
“The PM personally negotiated & changed the #Rafale deal behind closed doors. Thanks to François Hollande, we now know he personally delivered a deal worth billions of dollars to a bankrupt Anil Ambani. The PM has betrayed India. He has dishonoured the blood of our soldiers,” said Rahul Gandhi.
However, the incumbent French government has stepped in and tried to ‘cover’ it up. It clarified saying that there is no role in selecting Indian partners for Rafale.
But what’s further interesting is that the statement by the French govt doesn’t say anywhere that Hollande’s statement about Rafale deal is incorrect or wrong. It just stated the procedure for selection of offset partners by French firms.
Hollande has certainly dropped a big bomb over Rafale deal. All these clearly indicate a big embarrassment and trouble for Narendra Modi. Congress has been accusing Modi of helping Anil Ambani by recommending him to then French Government for Rafale.
What is Rafale Deal?
India had purchased 36 multirole fighter aircrafts for a price estimated to be worth Rs 58,000 crore (7.8 billion Euros) by The Defence Ministry of India from France’s Dassault Aviation.
Allegations
The allegation by Rahul Gandhi is that Modi had nominated Anil Ambani’s Reliance Defence Industries as France’s India partner in the Rafale jet deal.
During a no-confidence motion debate on 21 July 2018, Rahul Gandhi had made bold and direct accusations against Narendra Modi. The prime minister dismissed the allegations as ‘childish’ as the program’s interactions are between the governments of India and France, without any middlemen. Both governments had officially refuted the charges then.
But with the confession of former French president that India had recommended Reliance Defence Industries and France didn’t have an option, it is likely to stroke a major political controversy.
‘Mahaa’ Murthy who had resigned to his post in Mahaa news owing to his alleged ‘sting’ operation against Pawan Kalyan’s Janasena, has got a new job. Murthy would be joining TV5 news channel. Sources in the know confirmed the development. Murthy’s role and his post are not yet revealed. It is buzzed that it is going to be a significant role.
Murthy had earlier aired a story in Mahaa news over Janasena’s ‘secret meeting’ which was held to meet the potential donors for the party from a particular community. This story seems to have put Murthy in a tight spot. However, Murthy stood by his story and claimed that he hasn’t revealed several facts although he knew about them.
After resigning, Murthy in a YouTube video interview stated that he didn’t want to trouble the management of the channel (Mahaa) and its employees for his stories. He said he has put in papers for fair reasons. This is after Pawan’s hard core fans have heavily criticized Murthy and his stories online. The war between Pawan’s fans and Murthy seems to have become head-ache for the channel.
Let’s see, what would be Murthy’s fresh stand in the new job.
57
shares
First trailer of Mani Ratnam’s Nawaab didn’t give away much detail about the plot. The latest trailer makes it pretty clear that it is a film about war between brothers.Aravind Swamy plays the baddie and Simbu, Arun Vijay wages war against him. Vijay Sethupathi is the policeman who is after Aravind Swamy.
Santosh Shivan’s stunning visuals and captivating musical score by AR Rahman makes it a pleasing trailer to watch.Mani Ratnam has made some of the best gangster dramas before and Nawaab looks like another intriguing work from the master.
Impressive star cast and rich production values of Lyca Productions are an additional bonus to the film. Nawaab is clashing with DevaDas on September 27.
The sudden talk of “retirement from politics” from Telangana chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao’s nephew and Telangana irrigation minister T Harish Rao kicked up a storm in Telangana political circles on Saturday.Harish made the statement while addressing a huge rally at Ibrahimpur village near Siddipet, which he had adopted.
The villagers on Friday passed a resolution stating that all of them would vote for him in the coming elections.“I am overwhelmed by your affection and love. I don’t need anything else. I feel like retiring from politics as I enjoy your support and love,” he said in an emotional tone.It is not known whether he had made the statement out of emotion or it was a calculated statement. But political observers say it clearly indicates the brewing discontent in Harish over the way he was being sidelined by the family of TRS president.
Though he continued to remain loyal to KCR and has also been moving closely with his uncle, Harish is apparently feeling suppressed by KCR’s son K T Rama Rao and daughter Kavitha.A party source said if the TRS gets more than 80 seats, KTR would take the entire party and the power under his control and even push KCR to the sidelines.
It would mean the end of the road for Harish after the elections.
“Since Harish is a master strategist and can wield his influence over several districts of northern Telangana, he is being untouched. But once the elections are over, KTR would not hesitate to push Harish out of the party, if necessary or make him an insignificant character,” sources said.However, Harish is said to be having his own plans. If the TRS gets bare minimum majority, he would not hesitate to split the party and join hands with the rivals to avoid KTR from taking over the reins.
“But if his plans do not work out, he would quietly retire opt out from the party politics and wait for another five years,” the sources said.
Senior Telugu Desam Party leader and Andhra Pradesh minister for human resources development Ganta Srinivasa Rao would have joined the YSR Congress party by now, had there been serious objections raised from some senior leaders from the party.According to highly placed sources, Ganta, who was peeved with TDP president and Andhra Pradesh chief minister N Chandrababu Naidu, almost decided to get out of the party.
He strongly believed that Naidu was entertaining complaints against him from his colleague Ch Ayyanna Patrudu.What is more, He was disgruntled over a survey purportedly conducted by former MP Lagadapati Rajagopal’s team which said Ganta would lose his seat in the assembly elections from Bhimili in 2019.Apparently, Ganta believed that the survey was done at the behest of Naidu and suspected that the chief minister might axe him in the next elections.
Moreover, Ganta has also realised that the TDP has bleak chances of returning to power again in the next elections and may be, he is looking for an alternative to sustain his political career.So, he is learnt to have sent feelers to YSR Congress party president Y S Jaganmohan Reddy, not through Andhra leaders, but through a top leader in Telangana Rashtra Samithi who is closer to Jagan. And the YSRC chief, too, reportedly gave the consent.
“However, a senior YSRC leader, who has been advising Jagan on all key matters, put spokes in the plan and brainwashed Jagan against Ganta. Apparently, he told the YSRC chief that Ganta’s entry would damage the party in Visakhapatnam because of allegations of land grabbing against him and also the irregularities in higher education in collusion with his brother-in-law Municipal administration minister P Narayana. After that Jagan did not respond to Ganta’s further negotiations,” the sources said.
Having no other option, Ganta decided to stay back in the TDP, after Naidu assured him of retaining him from Bheemili in 2019 as well.